Penerapan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Three-Tier untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Sel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61291/supernova.v2i1.23Keywords:
student misconceptions, three-tier diagnostic test, biology education, instrument validity and reliability, miskonsepsiAbstract
This study aims to analyze the characteristics of the three-tier diagnostic test instrument on cell biology material, describe the level of students' misconceptions, and evaluate students' responses to the implementation of the instrument. This research employs a descriptive quantitative approach with a case study method focused on 11th-grade science students at SMAN 10 Pekanbaru during the 2023/2024 academic year. Data collection techniques involved the use of a three-tier diagnostic test, observation, documentation, and validated questionnaires. The three-tier diagnostic test was used to identify students' misconceptions through three stages: objective questions, reasoning behind the answers, and students' confidence in their responses. The data obtained were statistically analyzed to categorize the levels of students' misconceptions into low, moderate, and high. The results of the study showed that 41.7% of students experienced low misconceptions, 56.6% had moderate misconceptions, and 1.7% had high misconceptions.
Downloads
References
Aprilanti, H., Qurbaniah, M., & Muldayanti, N. D. (2016). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi sistem ekskresi manusia kelas XI MIA SMA Negeri 4 Pontianak. Jurnal Bioeducation, 3(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.29406/188
Assimi, E., Idrissi, R. J., Zerhane, R., & Boubih, S. (2022). The use of a three-tier diagnostic test to investigate conceptions related to cell biology concepts among pre-service teachers of life and earth sciences. Journal of Biological Education, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2134175
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fakhruddin, F., Azizahwati, & Rahmi, Y. (2012). Analisis penyebab miskonsepsi siswa pada pelajaran fisika di kelas XII SMA/MA Kota Duri. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 87–98. http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/1988/
Hamka, D., & Sholihat, N. (2021). Faktor-faktor penentu perilaku guru SMP menggunakan teknologi dalam pembelajaran online: Studi kasus di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Pendidikan, 22(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v22i2.1934.2021
Nurdiansyah, I., Hartati, S., & Rahayu, D. (2022). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada materi evolusi sub-bab adaptasi menggunakan metode three-tier test. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan, 3(2), 29–39. https://unikastpaulus.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jlpd/article/view/2059
Simorangkir, A., & Napitupulu, M. A. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada materi sistem ekskresi manusia. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v8i1.11247
Syahrul, D. A., & Setyarsih, W. (2015). Identifikasi miskonsepsi dan penyebab miskonsepsi siswa dengan three-tier diagnostic test pada materi dinamika rotasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 4(3), 67-70. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/13305
Treagust, D. F. (1986). Evaluating students' misconceptions by means of diagnostic multiple choice items. Research in Science Education, 16(1), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356835
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Maisyarah, Berry Kurnia Vilmala, Agusminarti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
